A legal
challenge to the presidential election could extend the political crisis.
With a petition filed in Kenya’s Supreme
Court against the October
26 rerun of the presidential election, the country risks an intensification
of political turmoil. The
challenge is the second since the initial elections in August, which were
overturned on grounds of alleged discrepancies in tabulation at the polling
stations and the computer systems. That unprecedented
ruling in September was
widely hailed as an exemplar of judicial independence. Since then, President
Uhuru Kenyatta has rammed through legislation that circumscribes the authority of the electoral mechanism and legal scrutiny of polls. The sense of intimidation was
palpable when most of the judges failed to show
up to hear a plea for the postponement of the vote. The outcome of the latest
legal challenge is therefore far from certain. If the judges again decide not
to uphold the latest victory for the incumbent, the
absence of a genuine contest could prove to be a critical factor. The
opposition leader, Raila Odinga, had withdrawn
from the second race in protest against the new legislation and the lack of material
improvement on the ground. Days before the October election, the election
commission lost the services of top officials, with one fleeing the country
saying she feared for her life. Such a turn of events came as a chilling
reminder of the mysterious death of a high functionary of the electoral body
just before the elections in August. Moreover, there was considerable scepticism over the credibility of the October vote, as a
large-scale revamp of the electoral system was seen to be impossible within
that timeframe.
This is why there is speculation that the court may see merit in
the petitioner’s claim that the polls were anything but free and fair. Both Mr.
Kenyatta and Mr. Odinga bear much moral responsibility for the current
stalemate and the violence. It is time they negotiated a lasting settlement to
restore credibility to Kenya’s democracy. That requires them, especially Mr.
Kenyatta, to play by the rules laid down under the 2010 constitution, which
provides for greater devolution of powers. Above all, there needs to be an end
to the near- monopoly of power enjoyed by the Kikuyu and the Kalenjin ethnic
communities since the country’s freedom from colonial rule. Memories of the
killing of hundreds in the aftermath of the 2007 elections should underscore
the urgency of bringing the current fluid situation within control. For its
part, the African Union must exert political pressure on Kenya’s two veteran
politicians to prevent the escalation of the crisis beyond Kenya’s borders.
This week the government lowered the forecast for GDP growth to below 5%, with
analysts blaming the political crisis for the negative sentiment. The social
cost of this upheaval would be incalculable. Strengthening the election mechanism against political interference
would be an important first step.
1. TURMOIL < TR/MOI/
L >
[Noun]
Meaningà A state of great disturbance, confusion, or
uncertainty.
Synà Confusion
, turbulence , commotion , agitation ,tumult
Antonymsà Calm
, [pronounced as <KAAM>],Order, Composure ,Contentment
Exampleà "the country was in turmoil"
2. UNPRECEDENTED <
UN/ PRAE/ SI /DEN/TED >
Adjective
Meaningà Ever done or
known before.
Synà Unparalleled , Unequalled ,Unmatched
,Unrivalled , Without parallel
Antonym-à Normal , Common
Exampleà “Tthe government took the unprecedented step of releasing confidential correspondence"
3. RAMMED < RAE / M / D >
[Verb = past tense: rammed]
Meaningà roughly force (something) into place ,
Synà , Thrust, Plunge ,Force Push, Sink, Dig, Stick, Cram, Jam
Antonymsà Aid ,Assit , Halt ,
Retreat
Exampleà he rammed his
sword back into its sheath"
4. CIRCUMSCRIBES < SIR/ KM/ S /KRI /B/D >
[Verb=3rd person present: circumscribes]
Meaningà Restrict (something) within limits
Synà Restrict,Limit,
Set/Impose limits on ,Crub ,Confine ,Keep within bounds
Exampleà "The minister's powers are
circumscribed both by tradition and the organization of local government
5. SCRUTINY < SCRU
/TEE/ NEE >
[Noun]
Meaningà Critical
observation or examination.
Synà Careful
, Examination , Inspection , Survey , Perusal ,Study , Scan
Exampleà Every
aspect of local government was placed under scrutiny"
6. INTIMIDATION <
IN / TEE / MEE /DAE / SH / N >
[Noun]
Meaning à Frighten or overawe (someone), especially in order to make
them do what one wants, [ Here ]= the action of
intimidating someone.
Synà Cowing , Menacing ,Terrifying , Scaring ,
Alarming.
Exampleà "The intimidation of witnesses and
jurors"
7. PALPABLE < PAEL /PAE /B /L >
[Adjective]
Meaningà (Of a feeling or atmosphere) so intense as to seem almost tangible.
Exampleà "A palpable sense of loss"
Synà Visible
, Notable , Perceptible , Perceivable , Noticeable , Appreciable , Arresting , Believable
8. INCUMBENT < IN /KM/BENT >
[Noun]
Meaning
à The holder of an office or post.
Exampleà "The present incumbent will
soon be retiring
Synà Holder , Bearer , Occupant , , Functionary, Official
Antonymsà Noncurrent
9. SCEPTICISM <
SEP/ TEE/ SI /SM >
[Noun]
Meaningà Doubt as to the
truth of something.
Synà Dubiousness, Inynicism, Distrust, mistrust, suspicion, misbelief, incredulity;
Pessimism,
Exampleà "These claims were treated with
scepticism"
10.
ESCALATION < ES /K / LAY /SH/ N >
[Noun]
Meaningà a rapid
increase; a rise.
Exampleà "cost escalations"
Synà Upsurge , Exacerbation Expansion , Mushrooming , Upswing , Growth Jump
Antonym à Plunge , Relaxation
Comments
Post a Comment